Standard Notesvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 686 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with