Standard Notesvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 | 24 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with