StackRendervsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| StackRender | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #34 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 555 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 10 Jun 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 50/100 for StackRender, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for StackRender.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; StackRender needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
StackRender details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep StackRender, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with