StackRendervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| StackRender | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #34 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 555 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 10 Jun 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 50/100 for StackRender, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for StackRender.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; StackRender needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
StackRender details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep StackRender, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with