SSH & Web TerminalvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SSH & Web Terminal | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 17 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, SSH & Web Terminal is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
SSH & Web Terminal details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with