SRSvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | 2 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with