SRSvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →Trenova details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep Trenova, compare it with