SRSvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 29 392 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 39 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with