livekitvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 21 912 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +813 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 39 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
livekit is growing faster right now (+813 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with