spiderfootvsZulip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | Zulip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 24 012 | 26 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 536 | +191 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zulip scores 82/100 against 77/100 for spiderfoot, so it is the safer default.
Zulip ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spiderfoot.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 536 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →Zulip details →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep Zulip, compare it with