spiderfootvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 012 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 536 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spiderfoot.
If you want the quickest setup, spiderfoot is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 536 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →voidaccess details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with