Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →TradingAgents details →