Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 41 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →ToolJet details →