Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafanavstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →temporal details →