SpeedarrvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedarr | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 0/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #34 of 34 in Network Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 24 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2026.09.21 · 21 Sept 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 0/100 for Speedarr, so it is the safer default.
Speedarr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedarr is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Speedarr details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Speedarr, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with