spacedrivevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spacedrive | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 34 in File Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 39 337 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +310 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
spacedrive scores 70/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spacedrive.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; spacedrive needs more configuration.
spacedrive details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep spacedrive, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with