copypartyvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 47 159 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +386 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+386 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with