soundscapevssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| soundscape | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 745 | 114 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 547 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for soundscape, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for soundscape.
If you want the quickest setup, soundscape is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).
soundscape details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep soundscape, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with