SonarQubevsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 56 874 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube details →Typst details →