SOLECTRUSvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SOLECTRUS | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 166 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 51/100 for SOLECTRUS, so it is the safer default.
SOLECTRUS ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; SOLECTRUS needs more configuration.
SOLECTRUS details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep SOLECTRUS, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with