SnitchvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Snitch | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 643 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.6.4 · 23 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 54/100 for Snitch, so it is the safer default.
Snitch ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
Snitch details →UUSEC WAF details →