Apache SkyWalkingvsZero
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #22 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 24 977 | 1 768 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v0.11.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 56/100 for Zero, so it is the safer default.
Zero ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →Zero details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep Zero, compare it with