Apache SkyWalkingvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with