Apache SkyWalkingvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with