Apache SkyWalkingvstorqvoice
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | torqvoice | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 22 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.
torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, torqvoice is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking details →torqvoice details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep torqvoice, compare it with