Apache SkyWalkingvsswarm-cronjob
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | swarm-cronjob | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →swarm-cronjob details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep swarm-cronjob, compare it with