Apache SkyWalkingvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with