Signal TLS ProxyvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Signal TLS Proxy | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 95 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 348 stars in 30 days).
Signal TLS Proxy details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Signal TLS Proxy, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with