ShellHubvsWeTTY
Two self-hosted Remote Access projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ShellHub | WeTTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 23 in Remote Access | #6 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 2 243 | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +175 | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WeTTY scores 69/100 against 64/100 for ShellHub, so it is the safer default.
WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ShellHub.
If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; ShellHub needs more configuration.
ShellHub is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).
ShellHub details →WeTTY details →All Remote Access projects →
Swap a project
Keep ShellHub, compare it with
Keep WeTTY, compare it with