ShellHubvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ShellHub | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 23 in Remote Access | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 2 243 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +175 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.28 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ShellHub scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
ShellHub ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; ShellHub needs more configuration.
ShellHub is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).
ShellHub details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep ShellHub, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with