ShellHubvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ShellHub | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 23 in Remote Access | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 243 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +175 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 64/100 for ShellHub, so it is the safer default.
ShellHub ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; ShellHub needs more configuration.
ShellHub is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).
ShellHub details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep ShellHub, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with