sglangvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sglang | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 38 344 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 936 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for sglang.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 936 stars in 30 days).
sglang details →Urocissa details →