sglangvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sglang | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 38 343 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 935 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 935 stars in 30 days).
sglang details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →