sentryvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sentry | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 45 671 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +839 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 11 |
| Latest release | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).
sentry details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep sentry, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with