Semaphore UIvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Semaphore UI | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 14 337 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Semaphore UI, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
Semaphore UI details →temporal details →