self-workerdvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-workerd | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in Serverless | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 141 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 36/100 for self-workerd, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-workerd.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; self-workerd needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
self-workerd details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep self-workerd, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with