Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM)vsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 165 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) needs more configuration.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with