Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM)vssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 165 | 114 258 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 549 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with