Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM)vsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 165 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with