self-hosted-livesync-servervsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-hosted-livesync-server | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
self-hosted-livesync-server details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with