self-hosted-livesync-servervssupabase
Two self-hosted Database Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-hosted-livesync-server | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 114 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, self-hosted-livesync-server is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
self-hosted-livesync-server details →supabase details →All Database Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with