self-hosted-livesync-servervsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-hosted-livesync-server | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
self-hosted-livesync-server details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with