self-hosted-livesync-servervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-hosted-livesync-server | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 13 313 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +303 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).
self-hosted-livesync-server details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with