seedsyncvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| seedsync | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 337 | 56 868 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 46/100 for seedsync, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for seedsync.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; seedsync needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
seedsync details →Typst details →