SeaweedFSvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 11 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →woodpecker-ci details →