SeaweedFSvsWhiteboard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Whiteboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #5 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 35 807 | 3 381 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +846 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 3 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.
If you want the quickest setup, Whiteboard is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+846 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Whiteboard details →