SeaweedFSvsvorker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | vorker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #6 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 35 803 | 204 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +842 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 36/100 for vorker, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for vorker.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; vorker needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →vorker details →