SeaweedFSvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 793 | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +868 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 18 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →voidaccess details →