SeaweedFSvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 35 803 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +842 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →