SeaweedFSvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 35 801 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +840 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Traffic Source details →